To read the financial press, the mobile
industry looks at a glance to be in a state
of consolidation and low growth. Vodafone
is under constant threat of shareholder
revolt, announcing huge losses and being
forced to sell its Swedish, Japanese and
perhaps US subsidiaries and holdings. The
US market has seen tremendous M&A activity
among the major operators including the
once mighty AT&T being bought by SBC,
a “Baby Bell” and once a subsidiary
of the national US monopoly. And on the
infrastructure side, Lucent and Alcatel
are conducting the first of the mega mergers
(if you don’t count what was left
of Marconi heading off to Ericsson).
But behind these headlines is a wellspring
of optimism. Expectations for stellar industry
performance may have been premature, but
by no means were they unfounded. According
to FierceWireless, the wireless industry’s
daily email newsletter, while three years
ago the sector was ‘stunted by cautious
optimism’, since then there has been
an overall resurgence and the industry
is poised for strong growth.
The evidence for this includes handset
sales increasing from 650m units in 2004
to over 800m forecasted units in 2008.
Moreover, the sales of enhanced data phones
tripled in 2005 to circa 100m units and
this is expected to double again in 2006.
3G and equivalent technologies represent
a significant percentage of handset sales
and are expected to be 'mainstream' by
2008.This growth is being driven by finally
getting consumer acceptance of the new
advanced handsets and enterprises going
mobile in a big way, as Blackberries becomes
the ‘de rigeur’ executive accessory.
Nowhere was the buoyant outlook more obvious
than at the mobile industry’s annual
gathering of the clans, 3GSM, which this
year moved from Cannes to Barcelona. The
event, which began ten years ago as a few
table-top displays outside a conference
discussing a digital cellular technology
called GSM, has outgrown the festival town
on the Cote d’Azur, and needed somewhere
that reflected its growing size and ecosystem.
In 2006 50,000 delegates flocked to the
Fira de Barcelona where nearly 1000 companies
were exhibiting.
But still, revenue growth for most major
mobile operators is in single figures,
due mainly to pressure on voice margins.
Allied to this, data revenues, which were
supposed to provide a high growth, high
margin replacement for falling voice revenues,
have stubbornly refused to reach the uptick
of the growth curve.
Most operators will break out data revenues
as a percentage of overall revenues, and
the average is in the mid-teens. But that
figure includes SMS text messages. The
suspicion is that non-SMS data usage, that
is browsing, music and video downloads,
video and picture messaging, gaming, ringtones,
the whole gamut of data activity, only
accounts for low single figures of revenue.
Failure to launch
And to blame for this? The failure of
3G to date to capture the public imagination,
and to deliver the experiences necessary
to lift those data ARPUs. 3G promised to
deliver consumers a true mobile internet
experience, touching broadband speeds,
and drove operators in some countries to
spend billions merely on spectrum licences,
and operators in all countries to spend
billions on network rollouts.
Yet from a consumer point of view, for
the past three years the launch of 3G has
been underwhelming. In most markets, 3G
was launched with a limited range of handsets,
which, because of the increased radio functionality
plus the need to support multimedia platforms,
were much bigger than consumers had grown
used to, with much shorter battery life.
Added to that, the data rates were far
more limited to almost fixed line dial-up
rates by the limited processing power available
on the handset.
Despite the prevalent view that the industry
tends to overhype its technology, most
operators (excluding 3, which as a stand
alone 3G operator had no choice) launched
3G services almost on the quiet. Most chose
to offer the same services they offered
through their existing data portals (Vodafone
live! T-Zones, O2 Active etc) but now “with
added 3G.” The result was such a
low profile seeping into the market that
many people are still unaware 3G is available.
One reason for this may be that, despite
the seeming imperative to drive data usage,
the existing battle for customer acquisition
remained around voice and SMS deals and
packages.
Mike Baker, CEO of Zinwave, a company
dedicated to providing a means of delivering
good radio network access within large
buildings and difficult spaces, says that
operators with large 2G networks were simply
not motivated to drive 3G uptake. In the
early days while promising to the operator
more network capacity and lower costs per
call in the long term, in the short term
the equipment was just too expensive and
immature.
“There are two camps, those who
take 3G as matter of life and death, and
those who view it as an extension of 2G,” says
Baker. “So 3, for example, is reliant
on making 3G a success and will do anything
to make it so. Other operators were more
relaxed as they viewed it as an extension
to 2G. They wanted people on 3G because
it freed capacity and was going to be cheaper
but they didn’t care too much because
if customers didn’t move to 3G, they
still had them on 2G. They decided they
don’t have to over-invest to make
coverage fabulous everywhere, whereas 3
has got to make sure it’s great everywhere.”
3G take two
But now, following widespread service
launches throughout 2004 and 2005, there
is a feeling in the industry that 3G has
now truly arrived and is poised for mass
adoption. According to the Global Mobile
Suppliers Association, there are now 355
devices on the market compatible with WCDMA
(the standard for all GSM-compatible networks),
from 41 suppliers. There are also now 108
WCDMA operators in 47 countries.
Stuart Paterson, a Director in Scottish
Equity Partners’ Information Technology
group, is in the camp that thinks that
3G has moved into a second phase. He says
that ‘3G part two’ is about, “Getting
the user experience right, the equipment
to work at the speeds expected while still
being cost effective.”
“Until the size of the handsets
and the battery life were at least comparable
with 2G handsets then operators couldn’t
hope to sell them in large volume,” Paterson
says. “As can be seen by the phenomenal
success of Motorola’s pink RAZR’ handset,
cell phones are a fashion item, and from
a user’s perspective better voice
quality and slow content access are irrelevant
in the buying decision.”
Dave Evans, CTO of SurfKitchen, a company
which develops software that helps operators
and phone manufacturers manage the user
interface on a mobile phone, says that
the corner has now been turned at the device
level.
“The technology itself is much more
established and the handsets are more appealing,
more capable and with a battery life closer
to what customers are used to. There’s
now a greater push for 3G phones because
the phones are appealing. You can see that
in 3’s customer acquisition figures
- when they had an appealing 3G phone such
as the LG phone then they took a huge leap,” Evans
says.
The second aspect of 3G phase two is the
upgrade of the 3G network itself to what
some say is 3.5G (or what 3G was expected
to be in the first place). Handset and
base station processing power has finally
caught up allowing true broadband access.
Most 3G networks are now scheduled for
a software upgrade called HSDPA (High Speed
Downlink Packet Access) which will increase
data rates on the downlink to something
truly akin to the multi megabit domestic
broadband user experience. HSDPA will be
followed by HSUPA, which will provide similar
capacities on the uplink, meaning a user
can send, as well as receive, large files.
The GSA says there are now 23 commercial
HSDPA networks, with 96 operators committed
to the technology.
Sanjay Jha is vice president of CDMA Technologies
at Qualcomm, a company that dominates the
chipset market for phones based on CDMA
technology (including 3G phones).
He says that HSDPA is unusual for a technology
in that the handsets are ready before the
networks are. Although this may be overstating
the case somewhat, Qualcomm does have 45
handsets being developed using its HSDPA
chipset, compared to 80 W-CDMA 3G handsets.
LG and Samsung have HSDPA phones available,
and there are also data cards from Option
and Novatel Wireless on the market. Jha
thinks that “by the second half of
2006, there will be an interesting range
of HSDPA devices.”
Behind closed doors
Although HSDPA brings a solution to the
capacity side of the network, and handset
vendors have been able to produce 3G handsets
that conform to 2G models of functionality
and usability, challenges still remain.
Jha himself highlights one of them. “In
my opinion the number one 3G problem is
indoor coverage. In every single technology
deployment the biggest single issue has
been indoor coverage, but in 3G’s
case this is somewhat accentuated because
it operates at the higher 2.1GHz frequency.”
SEP’s Paterson adds, “When
3G handsets start to look indistinguishable
from 2G handsets, driving wider adoption,
at that point we will begin to see the
limitations of 3G coverage, especially
in-building.”
The problem for 3G is that the higher
the frequency of a radio wave, the shorter
distance it travels and the harder it finds
it to penetrate buildings. And 3G operates
in most countries at 2.1GHz, compared to
900MHz or 1800MHz, for 2G networks.
In-building coverage matters for two main
reasons. The first is simply that most
mobile calls are actually originated and,
for that matter, received inside a building.
The second is that mobile operators are
keen to substitute fixed line usage for
mobile, both in people’s homes and
at work, and to do so they must bring reliability
and call quality somewhere near fixed line
levels.
Consumers may accept the odd dropped call
whilst in a train or their car as inevitable,
but will be less tolerant at home. Added
to this is the threat of fixed-mobile convergence
(FMC), as landline operators such as BT
attempt to use Wireless LAN coverage and
dual-mode cellular/WiFi phones to encourage
single-handset usage, in effect “stealing” the
mobile operators’ voice minutes whenever
the user is within range of a suitable
WiFi access point.
Chris Cox, Marketing Manager for ip.access,
says, “The big thing we see is the
battle for subscriber residential revenue.
Providing coverage and capacity in the
home will allow mobile operators to own
the end user device, by delivering high
speed data and low cost calls to people
in their homes.”
Guillaume d’Eyssautier, Chief Executive
Officer of picoChip, a developer of base
station chip solutions and software reference
designs, says that a home 3G base station,
linked to an IP network through DSL or
similar broadband connection, would let
users use their 3G phone whilst at home
or on the move. This has driven the recent
strategy by mobile operators such as BT,
Carphone Warehouse and Orange of bundling
voice and broadband access together. The
race is on to meet customer demand for
better mobile coverage, more service convenience
and lower costs. From the operators point
of view there is also the huge advantage
of the technical and operational synergies
in providing voice and data - be it fixed
or mobile - on one bill.
“The big advantage is that you can
use the 3G phone while on the move and
at home using a single handset and number
- and not involve the cost and power consumption
of a dual mode WiFi/cellular call,” says
d’Eyssautier.
“A 3G/wifi home base station connected
to broadband also adds data, allowing the
operator to provide better services over
3G in the home. It means they can increase
coverage and capacity and customer loyalty
and see the cost of calls reduce. Fixed
line operators are delivering VoIP over
Wifi phones to attack this market from
the other side. This is a cost-effective
way to counter that threat but is more
complicated for the user who will have
to use two handsets or a more expensive
wifi/3G handset with limited battery life.”
Home base stations (called pico-cells
in the industry) are a way to provide mobile
coverage in smaller buildings, but for
larger buildings there is an argument that
multiple pico-cells become uneconomical.
For larger buildings, and buildings with
awkward corners where radio coverage cannot
reach, distributed antenna systems (DAS)
may provide an answer. A DAS works by siting
a base station in, typically, the basement
of the building in question. That base
station is then connected via the existing
Ethernet fibre in the building to remote
antennas, which feed radio coverage out
into the building.
Zinwave’s Baker says operators have
not made a policy decision yet on whether
to adopt the picocellular or DAS model.
Up until now, he adds, if there has been
a problem with coverage the operators’ response
has been to add another tower outside.
But with 3G, and the threat of VoIP to
their voice revenues, that model is no
longer viable. So the change will come,
Baker says.
Remote control
But beyond issues of network coverage
and capacity, there still exists basic
usability issues around mobile phones.
If mobile operators are basing their business
cases on users making video calls, taking
videos and sharing them, sending pictures,
watching TV over mobile, using the phone
to send and receive email, play games and
download and listen to music, there is
still a large argument for making all of
that easier for users to access and use.
Paterson says, “That’s the
big challenging area for mobile operators.
The answer is to increase simplicity for
the user by making handsets intelligent,
so operators can sell more stuff and make
more money.”
It does not always have to be 3G that
provides the content and the extra operator
revenue as another SEP portfolio company
Radioscape is showing with the launch in
the UK by Virgin Mobile of ‘Mobile
TV’ handsets. These new handsets
rely on a mobile version of broadcast FreeView
Digital TV to deliver live high quality
news, sports and music to the handset using
established digital broadcasting technology
saving expensive 3G spectrum for customer
specific voice and data traffic.
“SurfKitchen is another company
that has added more intelligence into the
handset to make 3G work better,” says
Paterson. “So, for example, a handset
which is on-network will have the top ten
ringtones downloaded to it in the background
at an otherwise idle time, and then the
user is prompted to listen to them and
click to buy if there’s one he likes.
For operators wanting to change a handset’s
menu or promote content, it is attractive
for them to customise a handset remotely.
Certainly O2 found a far greater download
rate using “push” technology
such as this rather than rely on a user
browsing to a particular piece of content
on its portal.”
Dave Evans, CTO of SurfKitchen, says the
industry is moving away from a browsing
model, which relies on a user to “surf” as
he would on his home PC to particular sites
and content, to a client-server model.
“Client/server on-device exposure
brings an end user into a service and delivers
that service in a quicker, less latent
way. You get content in a managed way so
you are not worried about the cost and
if it’s working. As we move forward
I think operators are moving to defined
client-server applications on devices,
and moving browser activity off-net.”
Evans’ argument is that the industry
is now starting not just to bring technology
into the market, but making it easier to
use. Certainly, one area where the operators
have already trodden this path in is MMS
(multimedia messaging).
Francis Schmeer, Chief Marketing Officer
of messaging systems provider Empower Interactive,
says that when MMS was launched it was
hard to find on phones, and harder to use.
There was also a case of MMS being a technology
in search of a need, he says, as opposed
to voice and SMS which seemed to meet pre-defined
needs.
Schmeer argues that the lesson from MMS
is that operators need to focus on “consumer
benefits”, rather than promote technology.
He warns, “Consumers don’t
care about networks, whether they are using
a 3G, MMS or SMS network. They are more
focused on their own needs.
“At 3GSM this year we were inundated
with mobile TV and video plays, although
screen sizes are still small, and the usage
model and users’ willingness to pay
is still not clear. But I wouldn’t
be too negative because at the end of the
day this stuff is exciting. My personal
opinion is that you can’t ignore
what brings the money, voice, SMS, and
MMS, and continued investment in that infrastructure
is something we still have to focus on.”
With 3G a reality, but with increasing
competition in data and voice delivery
from other platforms, there remain investment
opportunities across the value chain.
“Venture capitalists and smaller
companies are highly valuable because they
allow for innovation and experimentation.
There’s still a tremendous amount
of growth in developing markets - take
Vietnam, where there are 92 million people,
and 10% penetration with an 80% growth
rate - so vendors must be global players
and you can’t just fund development
from Western Europe or Asia,” Schmeer
says.
SEP’s Paterson concludes, “The
investment cycle always goes a lot slower
than people expect. 2G took ten years.
After all that initial hype, 3G has taken
about eight years to go mainstream. But
people are demanding Blackberries and data
cards and the like, driving more capacity
on the network, and innovation in services
and devices can only drive that further.
“The performance of 3G handsets
on points such as improved voice quality
and lower cost of call delivery as well
as greater functionality means that 2G
phones will eventually fade out. Maybe
3G didn’t take the market by storm
like everyone expected, but now it is taking
over by stealth. And with mobile TV, radio,
music and video still at the earliest of
stages, there are clearly great opportunities
for companies that can help operators solve
the entwined challenges of coverage, capacity
and consumer user experience as well as
extracting more revenue.”
Keith Dyer is editor of Mobile Europe,
which has provided news and analysis of
mobile operators’ business and technical
strategies since 1990. www.mobileeurope.co.uk